"Negation of right to property." #1

Open
opened 2026-03-09 04:05:21 +02:00 by Zetetik · 0 comments

"NAPALM rejects this. It asserts that if you initiate force (Aggression), you logically negate your own right to property."

It's initiation of conflict, not force that is aggression. And you don't negate your property rights by aggressing. For example: I don't cease owning my body if I steal a penny.

"NAPALM rejects this. It asserts that if you initiate force (Aggression), you logically negate your own right to property." It's initiation of conflict, not force that is aggression. And you don't negate your property rights by aggressing. For example: I don't cease owning my body if I steal a penny.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Negative-Zero/nap-license#1